1 |
----- Forwarded message from Howard Chu <hyc@×××××××××××.com> ----- |
2 |
|
3 |
From: Howard Chu <hyc@×××××××××××.com> |
4 |
To: tarjei@××.no, openldap-software@××××××××.org |
5 |
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:49:21 -0700 |
6 |
Subject: RE: compiling 2.1.22 with db 4.0.x |
7 |
Message-ID: <007b01c3514b$28c65730$856350c1@CELLO> |
8 |
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
9 |
Sender: owner-openldap-software@××××××××.org |
10 |
Comment: openldap-software mailing list <http://www.OpenLDAP.org/lists/> |
11 |
|
12 |
> -----Original Message----- |
13 |
> From: owner-openldap-software@××××××××.org |
14 |
> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@××××××××.org]On Behalf Of Tarjei Huse |
15 |
|
16 |
> Hi, |
17 |
> Is it possible to compile the latest OpenLDAP against Sleepycat dB |
18 |
> 4.0.x? If not, why? What is the latest version where this may be done? |
19 |
> Tarjei |
20 |
|
21 |
In software, anything is possible. Some things are not advisable, though. |
22 |
|
23 |
In this case, BDB 4.0 has a number of resource leaks and other bugs that will |
24 |
cause slapd to lockup after running for some period of time. I ran into these |
25 |
bugs while developing back-bdb originally, and I never checked to see if they |
26 |
also affect back-ldbm. It's possible, but I don't know. If you manually edit |
27 |
the configure script to bypass the version check, you can use BDB 4.0 with |
28 |
the latest OpenLDAP release if you really want to. But that would really be |
29 |
asking for trouble. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- Howard Chu |
32 |
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun |
33 |
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc |
34 |
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
----- End forwarded message ----- |