1 |
Alexandre Buisse wrote: |
2 |
> I think the time has come for me to retire as a gentoo dev. There are |
3 |
> multiple reasons to that, but mainly, it has stopped being fun a good |
4 |
> while ago, and I don't like where I see the project heading. |
5 |
> |
6 |
Man well if it stopped being fun, fair enuff. I hope you'll continue to use |
7 |
gentoo and contribute without the grief. |
8 |
|
9 |
> I'm also worried of how more and more things get done secretly, be it |
10 |
> because "we don't want bad PR" or because "feedback at this stage would |
11 |
> only slow things down". We shouldn't consider users as idiots or people |
12 |
> from whom we need to hide. This is free software, remember? |
13 |
> |
14 |
I didn't realise things were done secretly (of course ;) There's always |
15 |
going to be people discussing stuff in private, but at least the council |
16 |
meetings are in public. |
17 |
|
18 |
++ to your sentiments about usrs. From what I can see, too many devs look |
19 |
down on them (despite having started off as usrs.) For that reason alone, I |
20 |
am really sad to see you go. |
21 |
|
22 |
Sorry I missed in the other post about that you were leaving. Especially as |
23 |
I use tex for my academic work.. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Another thing that I dislike are the rules that get added everywhere. |
26 |
> There is a growing layer of bureaucracy, and I really don't think we |
27 |
> want to go in this direction. It restricts freedom, it takes time and |
28 |
> energy and it encourages playing "by the rule book" which I thought was |
29 |
> opposed to the very spirit of free software. More rules won't help us |
30 |
> solving whatever problems we may have, but it will certainly make the |
31 |
> project less fun to work on. |
32 |
> |
33 |
TBH I think all that was needed was saying that the pre-existing rules apply |
34 |
to all on the dev m-l, and actually *enforcing* those rules for devs. |
35 |
Devrel is clearly not set up for that, so I support the new dev-mods (sorry |
36 |
proctors is a silly name imnsho as only Americans get it. I understand from |
37 |
a US buddy that a proctor is someone who gives you an aural examination cf |
38 |
viva. I /really/ dislike that connotation.) |
39 |
|
40 |
> I see a general trend, sometimes wished for, of becoming a business-like |
41 |
> environment. Including a proper hierarchy and a "rule enforcement" |
42 |
> department. Well, I'll tell you what: I don't want a boss, especially on |
43 |
> a voluntary project. And, though I perfectly understand that this is not |
44 |
> shared by everyone else, I couldn't care less about being a business or |
45 |
> not. |
46 |
> |
47 |
Amen to that; I don't think working on a Free project precludes standards of |
48 |
behaviour tho. And like it or not, someone has to enforce them. |
49 |
|
50 |
> To end my list of griefs, I really dislike the fact that people with a |
51 |
> gentoo.org address think of themselves as somehow better than users (I |
52 |
> don't throw the stone to anyone, I certainly did indulge in this as |
53 |
> well). I feel that gentoo is not enough about users, and that they don't |
54 |
> get even the respect everyone deserves. Unfortunately, projects like |
55 |
> userrel can only do so much when the real problem is in everyone's |
56 |
> mindset. And I don't really see a solution to this problem being found |
57 |
> anytime soon, since the said problem isn't even acknowledged. |
58 |
> |
59 |
Well at least a *dev* has said it now ;) |
60 |
|
61 |
> I'm aware that in a perfect world, I would stay on board and try to |
62 |
> steer the project in a direction that I would like. I tried that for a |
63 |
> bit and it was quite obvious that I wouldn't be supported by a |
64 |
> significant part of the community. And I don't have the time nor energy |
65 |
> to lobby this properly. I had some ideas for a metastructure proposal |
66 |
> that would perhaps have helped some of the issues I talked about, but I |
67 |
> honestly don't think it would have stood any chance of being accepted, |
68 |
> especially since it would have meant suppressing the council power *and* |
69 |
> would have needed to be voted by the same council. |
70 |
> |
71 |
I think you're underestimating the *current* council. But meh, you've left |
72 |
now. |
73 |
|
74 |
<snip> |
75 |
> As a final word (sorry, this got a bit longer than planned), let me say |
76 |
> that if I sounded bitter in the beginning of this email, it's only |
77 |
> because I care a lot about gentoo, and I hope that this email, in its |
78 |
> modest way, will help making it a little bit better. |
79 |
> |
80 |
Thanks for your clear reasoning. I'm really sorry that gentoo has lost yet |
81 |
another dev, and that you've had such a bad experience recently. My |
82 |
apologies to you for any part I have played in that. |
83 |
|
84 |
Good luck, mate! |
85 |
|
86 |
|
87 |
-- |
88 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |