1 |
Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> said: |
2 |
> Hello here, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug |
5 |
> 116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals |
6 |
> need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a |
7 |
> particular arch. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Betelgeuse is working on a repoman check for this issue, meanwhile, if there |
10 |
> are more virtuals planned, please bear this in mind. :) |
11 |
|
12 |
It makes no sense to make a check to verify what seems to be broken |
13 |
behaviour. The virtuals should be like any other ebuild in the tree. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting toolchain x86) |
17 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
18 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
19 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
20 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |