Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:28:39
Message-Id: 20140113192736.2f60cef1@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:07:39 +0000
2 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:46:59 +0100
5 > Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700
8 > > "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> wrote:
9 > >
10 > > > Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but
11 > > > again I'm not sure it's a game changer for users.
12 > >
13 > > Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools can
14 > > query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them with
15 > > a different package manager.
16 >
17 > Not an API. APIs are bad. What we should have is a good set of
18 > lightweight Unix-friendly command line tools. See, for example, the
19 > "Scripting Commands" section of "man cave".
20
21 It still is an API that way, just expressed differently; if you
22 would only do this you're introducing forks where you might not need
23 them. Providing shell commands is one possible binding to the API...
24
25 --
26 With kind regards,
27
28 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
29 Gentoo Developer
30
31 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
32 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
33 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>