| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Markus Meier wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> my proposals: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> xft: Build with support for XFT font renderer (x11-libs/libXft) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
+1 |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
BTW, why do we have a virtual/xft? Is this a leftover from the times |
| 10 |
of monolithic X? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> And the special case, which probably needs some discussion is the |
| 13 |
> gsm flag. 7 out of 9 packages use it as a dep of media-sound/gsm, |
| 14 |
> the other two depend on sys-apps/pcsc-lite ("Add support for EAP-SIM |
| 15 |
> authentication algorithm"). |
| 16 |
> The question is, whether we should create the global useflag for the |
| 17 |
> seven packages and leave the pcsc-lite packages as they are (as we |
| 18 |
> "allow" overriding since we have local useflag descriptions in |
| 19 |
> metadata.xml), or preferably rename the useflag for the two |
| 20 |
> pcsc-lite packages. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If the flags have completely different meanings, then they should have |
| 23 |
different names. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ulrich |
Archives