| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:16:02 +0300
|
| 5 |
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> > Uhm, no. The "make them die" would be done on an EAPI bump, so users |
| 7 |
> > won't be affected. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > You *do* test things before committing, right? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I wouldn't expect this answer from you given your experience in Gentoo |
| 12 |
> development and its internals. You know that people do EAPI bumps |
| 13 |
> without proper testing or without taking into consideration the |
| 14 |
> features included in each EAPI. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You mean to say that you think Gentoo developers are lazy and
|
| 17 |
incompetent?
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Because, uh, if that's seriously what you're suggesting, then we have
|
| 20 |
bigger problems.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- --
|
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk4W2bgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHQqACgjaXvbXHzmznVIAVeGcccQ7CF
|
| 28 |
RRwAoIA2+xml2HlkqZ5ODvIxMn9Ach0O
|
| 29 |
=Le7S
|
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives