1 |
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Jack Morgan <jmorgan@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I'm hoping to get some feedback from the community as to what should be |
3 |
> supported and what can be reduced. My overall plan as I mentioned in a |
4 |
> previous email to reduce the total number of keywords for ia64 to a more |
5 |
> manageable level. I'd like to continue to have ia64 be a stable arch for |
6 |
> gentoo for as long as it makes sense. |
7 |
|
8 |
For example, you could choose to skip keywording Qt5... as more and |
9 |
more apps and Qt-based libraries transition from Qt4 to Qt5, the |
10 |
number of keyworded/stable packages will also drop for ia64, since you |
11 |
will gradually lose all packages that have become Qt5-only. |
12 |
|
13 |
If you're looking for an immediate reduction of ia64 packages, you can |
14 |
go a step further and drop Qt4 keywording as well (maybe with the |
15 |
exception of dev-qt/qtcore which is needed by some non-GUI apps), |
16 |
especially considering that ia64 is server-oriented, and that all your |
17 |
machines don't have a video card. |
18 |
|
19 |
These are just some random suggestions; if the ia64 arch team is |
20 |
interested, let us (the qt team) know so that we can figure out the |
21 |
details together. |
22 |
|
23 |
Thanks, |
24 |
Davide |