Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:31:50
Message-Id: 200510172327.29426@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin by Chris Gianelloni
1 On Monday 17 October 2005 23:14, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
2 > Actually, I think it is plugin-compatible with netscape, not necessarily
3 > netscape-based.  For example, Konquerer can use the same plugins.  At
4 > any rate, it is probably best to think about this now, hence using
5 > nsplugin, rather than later, when whiz-bang $browser comes out that has
6 > its own plugin interface.
7 I quote entirely what Chris said... also, Konqueror uses KParts as plugins,
8 nsplugins are an "extra", so yeah we have at least two plugins interfaces
9 already present. The fact that KParts are more than plugins for konqueror is
10 another point ;)
11
12 --
13 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
14 Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE