1 |
Ciaran, |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/19/10 21:16, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> No, that's the nice thing about delivering a product based upon |
6 |
> technical merit: most of the time, there are right answers and there |
7 |
> are wrong answers, and careful investigation and good management can |
8 |
> lead to it being determined which is which. |
9 |
|
10 |
I think you neglect differences in values. |
11 |
|
12 |
Say the degree of backwards-compatibility: there's no wrong nor right |
13 |
without values. Both sides have pros and cons. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
> Collaboration works when good ideas get kept and bad ideas get dropped. |
17 |
> Collaboration fails when good ideas are rejected because people don't |
18 |
> like who came up with them |
19 |
|
20 |
If you had better tone it would be much easier to accept the good among |
21 |
your ideas. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
> or the tone in which they were presented, or |
25 |
> when bad ideas are kept around to avoid hurting the feelings of the |
26 |
> people who came up with those ideas. |
27 |
|
28 |
Saying "no" politely is hard, not impossible. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
>>> Personally, I'd like to see Gentoo start having the kinds of people |
32 |
>>> who deliver a better product, not the kinds of people who worry |
33 |
>>> that using a gender-ambiguous cow as a logo might be offensive. |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> I don't consider that comment respectful. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> But do you consider it to be correct? |
38 |
|
39 |
No, I don't. I have said "technical is not our main problem" many times. |
40 |
|
41 |
Best, |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
Sebastian |