| 1 |
Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger |
| 3 |
> <vapier@g.o> and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the |
| 4 |
> OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and |
| 5 |
> committed it to the tree this weekend. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Since my offer to work on the migration was not good enough for him, I'm |
| 8 |
> backing out and allowing him to handle the whole migration himself since |
| 9 |
> I haven't heard from him at all despite Roy (author of OpenRC) and my |
| 10 |
> attempts to contact him for 2 weeks regarding a migration plan for |
| 11 |
> OpenRC. All issues and comments can be directed to him. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I guess working together and documenting everything before having it hit |
| 14 |
> the tree was a bad plan and it had to be one-upped. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Well, *somebody* had better get their act together and talk with me |
| 17 |
about the migration document. I don't care about the ebuild so much as I |
| 18 |
do about making sure there's a howto for the migration process. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If baselayout-2 & OpenRC are the future of Gentoo, then gosh darnit, we |
| 21 |
need to work together. That means people "in the know" need to |
| 22 |
communicate with me on the draft (that I've already sent to cardoe), |
| 23 |
regardless of any who's-ebuild-are-we-using-epenis-fights. :) |
Archives