1 |
On 6/15/07, Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Syntax shouldn't repeat package name twice. It wouldn't make much sense |
4 |
> to use it with >=some-cat/foo-4.0 <some-cat/bar-4.3 would it? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> There's been bug 4315 for ages, so maybe just reassign it to PMS? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
I was thinking about AND dependencies but the only reasonable examples I |
10 |
could thing of were ranges of versions and thus didn't recognize bug 4315 |
11 |
("add support for version ranges in DEPEND") as *exactly* what I was talking |
12 |
about. It's already on SpanKy's EAPI-1 list, so, sorry for the channel |
13 |
noise. |
14 |
|
15 |
- John |