Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:15:11
Message-Id: 50A2B811.8050909@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF by Alexis Ballier
1 Alexis Ballier schrieb:
2 > On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:05 +0100
3 > Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> If there are no objections, i plan to add E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF
6 >> to the list of USE_EXPAND variables for x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17, in
7 >> the next days.
8 >>
9 >
10 > i doubt there will be any objection but with such information there
11 > cant be any :)
12
13 You destroyed my plan ;-)
14 >
15 > - there is no x11-wm/enlightenment:0.17 in the tree
16
17 This is currently in the enlightenment overlay. Since there are now
18 alpha snapshots, i plan to add it to the main tree after doing some
19 tests in the overlay (including the usage of the USE_EXPAND variable).
20
21 > - what will be the possible values and use case of these variables ?
22
23 e17 has a good amount of modules, which can be excluded at compile time.
24 Each module has a USE flag, some examples for those USE flags:
25
26 e_modules_conf-theme, e_modules_conf-wallpaper2, e_modules_ibar,
27 e_modules_temperature
28
29 > - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake,
30 > etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only
31 > E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes the "confusion" harder.
32 >
33
34 Those functions are internal ebuild functions, while the USE_EXPANDed
35 var is exposed to and may be used by the user, so i dont see a high risk
36 of people mixing them. Maybe some other people can also comment on this?
37
38
39 --
40
41 Thomas Sachau
42 Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies