| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: [Wed Jul 12 2006, 05:11:01PM EDT] |
| 2 |
> Uh... Sorry but it's pretty hard to imagine something more annoying |
| 3 |
> than an ebuild that dies after a couple of hours compile just |
| 4 |
> because upstream decided to rename Changelog.txt to ChangeLog.txt |
| 5 |
> and noone noticed during version bump, or because someone made |
| 6 |
> a typo there. Fail to see any benefit from this... :S Ditto for |
| 7 |
> manpages. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The point is to catch the problems at version-bump time or typo-time |
| 10 |
rather than put a broken ebuild into portage. IMHO this change can |
| 11 |
mean nothing but goodness for the overall quality of the portage tree. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Surely you don't go around version-bumping and typo-ing without |
| 14 |
testing prior to commit, right? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Aron |
Archives