1 |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> 2017-01-31 3:22 GMT-05:00 David Seifert <soap@g.o>: |
3 |
>> Proxy-maint has always been there, so no real excuse for all those bugs |
4 |
>> rotting away. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I didn't bother with finding another maint who'd proxy it for me, |
7 |
> yeah, that's my bad. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
>> Here's the deal: If you fix all those bugs within the 30 |
11 |
>> day time period, we'll keep it in the tree. Please also modernize the |
12 |
>> eclass a bit, and preferably drop all ebuilds to unstable. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I'll make a new release of leechcraft itself and bump the version to |
15 |
> that new one, so they'll naturally be dropped to unstable, 0.6.70 and |
16 |
> earlier (if any) indeed could be removed. Most of the bugs, as I saw |
17 |
> them, are due to the current last released version being 2.5 years old |
18 |
> and obviously bitrotten somewhat since then. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The ebuilds I have around use multibuild to build both qt4 and qt5 |
21 |
> versions according to use flags. Is that still relevant, or the world |
22 |
> has migrated to qt5 and the benefit of still supporting qt4 is not |
23 |
> worth the effort and clumsiness? |
24 |
|
25 |
Yeah, drop qt4 please. |
26 |
|
27 |
Thanks, |
28 |
Davide |