Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Lienhardt <michael.lienhardt@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Dead X11 packages
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:57:01
Message-Id: b66591f3-f4f1-f15f-b33c-dc89dadb62de@laposte.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Dead X11 packages by Brian Evans
1 >> From e590965cdeb0c921194740da0481c85afaa1ebae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 >> From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
3 >> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:02:59 -0800
4 >> Subject: x11-base/xorg-server: Remove dead x11-proto/xf86rushproto dependency
5 >>
6 >> rushproto hasn't been required since upstream commit 8ec79e05feac (in
7 >> 2005!), and even then it wasn't actually needed!
8 >>
9 >> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
10 >> ---
11 >> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.19.5.ebuild | 3 +--
12 >> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.19.6.ebuild | 3 +--
13 >> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-9999.ebuild | 3 +--
14 >> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
15 >>
16 >
17 > Please don't edit dependencies in-line like this.
18 >
19 > This warranted a revbump as users will be asking how to remove
20 > x11-proto/xf86rushproto. It won't come up for depclean because of
21 > xorg-server not being scheduled for rebuild automatically until the next
22 > time it is upgraded or --changed-deps option is used (uncommon).
23 >
24 > Brian
25
26 Citing Kenneth Hoste at FOSDEM this year: modifying a package without changing its version is a bad idea.
27 His presentation was very good (video included): https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/how_to_make_package_managers_cry/
28
29 Michael

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Dead X11 packages Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>