1 |
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Krzysiek Pawlik kirjoitti: |
5 |
> > Yuri Vasilevski wrote: |
6 |
> >> I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass |
7 |
> >> for ${ETYPE} == sources. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel sources, but not |
10 |
> > everybody runs `make install'. I'm for dropping debianutils from |
11 |
> > system. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> |
14 |
> BSD, prefix etc. I would say breaking make install is worse than |
15 |
> requiring people to keep debianutils installed. They can just use |
16 |
> package.provided if they want to get rid of it. |
17 |
|
18 |
What's wrong with making it an optional dependency? Something like a |
19 |
useflag |
20 |
|
21 |
makeinstall - Set this if you use 'make install' to install your kernels. |
22 |
|
23 |
which would trigger the dependency. That way, both groups of people have |
24 |
their way without breaking dependencies, right? |
25 |
|
26 |
MSB |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
You know that you're lonely when you start laughing at your own jokes. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |