| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without |
| 3 |
> understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are |
| 4 |
> only few people who have any idea about the current profile |
| 5 |
> structure... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No argument there. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
We may very well still end up with something hierarchical, but we can |
| 10 |
at least limit that to the parts of the profile where it matters. |
| 11 |
Maybe x86/BSD and amd64/Linux and amd64/Linux-hardened need to be |
| 12 |
interdependent. However, that still gets rid of need to deal with |
| 13 |
desktop environments, init systems, arguments over what belongs in |
| 14 |
@system, and so on. We could have a blocker mechanism to keep people |
| 15 |
from mixing systemd with BSD, or we could just let people shoot |
| 16 |
themselves in the foot. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Sounds like a good time to start reverse engineering the profiles... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives