| 1 |
On Thursday 09 June 2005 20.05, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> > I still fail to see why everything done by Gentoo devs belongs on the |
| 3 |
> > Gentoo page. The only article that belongs on the Gentoo page is the one |
| 4 |
> > about the Enoch and how it became Gentoo. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Because it's something relevant to Linux done by a member of our |
| 7 |
> community. And of course we care what people in our community are doing, |
| 8 |
> don't we? Well, I guess some of us don't. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Just wondering. |
| 11 |
Who decides what goes on or stays off the list. What criteria should be/is |
| 12 |
used in the process? ("relevant" and/or "significant" are very subjective). |
| 13 |
Is it a "dead" list that should stay in (a possibly edited) a specified form |
| 14 |
forever? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Martin S |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Martin Skjöldebrand (http://www.skjoldebrand.org) |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux: shieldfire @ irc.freenode.net |
| 22 |
Scandinavian Archaeology http://www.scandarch.com |
Archives