| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 23:38 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:15 +0200, Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > - the new ebuilds should add a new configuration file with the new syntax, and |
| 5 |
> > should depend on: || ( >=sys-libs/pam-0.78 virtual/pam ). This would fix the |
| 6 |
> > previous point, as who is using openpam will use the ~arch packages which |
| 7 |
> > will be fixed one by one (by me, submitting patches to maintainers), this way |
| 8 |
> > the packages will work out-of-the-box for both g/linux and g/fbsd users (i |
| 9 |
> > haven't searched on macosx, but should be, as they have the same userlands of |
| 10 |
> > fbsd). |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Ugh, no - just more crud that somebody will have to clean out later. |
| 14 |
> Like I said, get pam-0.78 and issues fixed, bumped to stable on all |
| 15 |
> linux archs, and we can scourge the tree. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Actually, its in ~, so should be fine if we want to start doing it. |
| 19 |
Just keeping it synced might be an issue as as we can not depend on |
| 20 |
>=pam-0.78 ... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 26 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives