| 1 |
On 11/26/07, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> So. let's face it, the only people who agree on the need for a GLEP |
| 3 |
> is Alec and Ciaran. The rest of the thread (which by the way I had |
| 4 |
> to dig up on Gmane because I didn't really give a damn) is composed |
| 5 |
> by Thilo who think is a great idea, and by Jer who answered to |
| 6 |
> Thilo saying, afaics, that he doesn't see the reason to make it |
| 7 |
> *mandatory*. Then there is Doug. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Er, I don't think it's a bad idea. Heck, I suggested it several years |
| 10 |
back. What I do think is that there are several less than ideal aspects |
| 11 |
of the way it's proposed that could easily be fixed by someone spending |
| 12 |
a few hours going through the GLEP process. These aren't difficult |
| 13 |
changes, but they will substantially improve the end result. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And no, the GLEP process isn't broken. Well thought out proposals can |
| 16 |
be approved very quickly, and the GLEP process helps iron out any |
| 17 |
problems in the proposals. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives