| 1 |
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 04:35:22 +0100 |
| 2 |
Michael Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Is there any mileage in something as ridiculous as AUTOUNMASK_EXCLUDES ? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Would depend on what that means, where that variable was used, and what |
| 7 |
it contains.... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
But the sort of breakage type it can trigger is not limited to any |
| 10 |
specific package. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Pretty much any ** packages are prone to this happening, and that's so |
| 13 |
unacceptable, that people have suggested/considered removing ** |
| 14 |
packages just to avoid this issue. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And that pretty much makes the defined purpose of those packages |
| 17 |
useless, and makes that keywording grade useless. |
Archives