Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:49:00
Message-Id: 20090516174730.1d7dd5b7@snowmobile
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 by Arun Raghavan
1 On Sat, 16 May 2009 22:14:30 +0530
2 Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
3 > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 12:39 -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote:
4 > > For one, there's the restriction that all *-alpha/*-rc has to be
5 > > represented _rc/_alpha. I plan on doing more research into perhaps
6 > > lifting this restriction in a future EAPI, but this would of course
7 > > require glep 55's solution.
8 >
9 > As Tobias stated, I also prefer coming up with solutions to these
10 > problems *now*, and fixing them, rather than implementing (IMO) a
11 > fugly solution to make solving potential problems that we don't know
12 > exist easier.
13
14 Ok, what are all the things requiring format-break changes that we'll
15 want in the next ten years? Please provide a complete list.
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55 Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>