| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 21 May 2003 23:05, Kumba wrote: |
| 5 |
> I always thought integrating an IRCd would be a pain in the neck into |
| 6 |
> portage because of their method of requiring the user to edit header |
| 7 |
> files before compiliation, and with instances like you've mentioned. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If hybrid is any example, adding others, like Bahamut, Unreal, Tiamat, |
| 10 |
> etc.., will probably be...."fun". |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I used to do a little work on the IRCD-Hybrid team... If you're looking at |
| 13 |
hybrid 7, it should be ok enough, but hybrid 6 (which is still widely used, |
| 14 |
a.o. on the EFNet server i'm on) will require quite extensive patches to |
| 15 |
config.h as almost all settings are defined in there, and the defaults wont |
| 16 |
do much good if you plan on actually having users on it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Is there anything but the kernel sources that gets installed as a source |
| 19 |
package which you then must manually configure and compile? hybrid 6 would |
| 20 |
fit very well into that category if so. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- --Erik |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQE+y9+ids9m9uhAobARAvBmAJ95UfgJjkTScDeWyzkR9l+tnln6DACgkFKW |
| 28 |
9WBvLxrkVOaHxPtmE0ZDE2o= |
| 29 |
=q0ev |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives