1 |
On 1/5/2021 16:05, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
2 |
> On 1/5/21 8:43 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi Thomas, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> On 2021/01/05 13:08, Thomas Mueller wrote: |
6 |
>>>> I'd like feedback from people about the possibility of dropping support |
7 |
>>>> for uclibc-ng. If you are unfamiliar, its the successor to uclibc as a |
8 |
>>>> C Standard Library for embedded systems, ie a replacement for glibc |
9 |
>>>> bloat. However, it is inferior to musl which serves the same purpose |
10 |
>>>> and which has now well supported in Gentoo. |
11 |
>>>> I know people want musl support, but does anyone even care about |
12 |
>>>> uclibc-ng? If not, I can work towards deprecating it and putting what |
13 |
>>>> little time I have towards musl. |
14 |
>>>> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
15 |
>>>> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
16 |
>>> Are you the only Gentoo developer working on musl and uclibc-ng? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm the only one working on uclibc-ng. There are some people helping |
19 |
> with musl, especially the overlay. |
20 |
> |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> One thing I might try with a Gentoo uclibc-ng system is convert to musl or glibc using crossdev. |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> From what I see on the internet, there is more support for musl than uclibc-ng, and more people working with musl than with uclibc-ng. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> It does seem that musl is winning the embedded libc race. |
27 |
> |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> There is a musl-cross-make cross-toolchain that can be built from non-musl or even non-Linux. |
30 |
>>> |
31 |
>>> https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> I've used crossdev in the past. It was a nasty experience, but I |
34 |
>> believe crossdev in Gentoo is getting better and better, and it supports |
35 |
>> many more targets. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Yes it is, which is why I'm preparing pre-build stage3's on several |
38 |
> arches so you don't have to x-compile. I've done the nasty part for you. |
39 |
> |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>>> From what I have seen, musl looks more promising than uclibc-ng, and more user- and developer-friendly. |
42 |
>>> |
43 |
>>> Unless somebody wants to take over uclibc-ng for Gentoo, I say better for you, with your limited time, to drop uclibc-ng in favor of musl. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Correct, if I had the time, I'd continue to support both. But my time |
47 |
> is limited, so I need to concentrate. I'm just looking for anyone to |
48 |
> scream if I'm destroying their world by dropping uclibc-ng. If no one |
49 |
> does, then I'll begin the process of removing it from the tree. |
50 |
> |
51 |
>> |
52 |
>> Not doing embedded work at the moment, but just out of hand as of right |
53 |
>> now if I had to make a choice I'd definitely look at MUSL as first |
54 |
>> choice. So +1 for that suggestion. |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> Kind Regards, |
57 |
>> Jaco |
58 |
|
59 |
I was using uclibc-ng builds for MIPS to build netboot images between 2017 |
60 |
and 2019 to refine my build processes. uclibc-ng still produces smaller |
61 |
overall binaries and libs for the netboot than musl does (usually ~1MB |
62 |
smaller, which is actually significant, especially on SGI IP22 systems). |
63 |
|
64 |
Unfortunately for uclibc-ng, it stopped working for me in ~2019. I have no |
65 |
clue why, either. The March 2019 uclibc-ng MIPS stage3 I built internally |
66 |
works perfectly fine when you unpack it and leave it alone, but as soon as |
67 |
you compile *anything* more recent with the compiler that's when the |
68 |
breaking begins. |
69 |
|
70 |
Rebuilding ncurses in this stage3 will break Python, which breaks emerge. |
71 |
Never figured it out. I can trace the failure using GDB to a point in |
72 |
Python, but not much farther beyond that. I assume the true cause is |
73 |
something in uclibc-ng itself. Upstream seems to like to borrow chunks of |
74 |
glibc for things, and I wonder if that may be partly to blame. |
75 |
|
76 |
I eventually gave up and went to musl for MIPS/o32. musl quite literally |
77 |
JustWorks(). It's great. Even with that tiny bit of bloat in the netboot |
78 |
build (workable, cause I needed to make NFS Root an option anyways). |
79 |
|
80 |
So long story short, I won't shed any tears if uclibc-ng goes away. |
81 |
|
82 |
-- |
83 |
Joshua Kinard |
84 |
Gentoo/MIPS |
85 |
kumba@g.o |
86 |
rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27 |
87 |
177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943 |
88 |
|
89 |
"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And |
90 |
our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." |
91 |
|
92 |
--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic |