1 |
Wouter van Kleunen wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I wrote a new init system that has numerous advantages over the old script |
6 |
> based init system. Please have a look at: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> pinit.sf.net |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I am a gentoo user, and i converted my scripts -> services for my system. |
11 |
> I would like to have feedback on this system. Please try it out on your |
12 |
> system (safely from your home directory). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Wouter |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
22 |
|
23 |
If changing the init system is on the cards, it would be far better to go |
24 |
for minit. |
25 |
|
26 |
http://www.fefe.de/minit/ |
27 |
|
28 |
It is as small as possible, does not require massive unaudited libraries, |
29 |
programmed with security in mind, does not impose a language requirement - |
30 |
it will work with shell scripts just fine, but encourages the use of just |
31 |
simple sym links. It wouldn't be overly arduous to make it work with |
32 |
gentoos current system. |
33 |
|
34 |
It can be linked against diet libc too, giving better performance and |
35 |
reducing code bloat. |
36 |
|
37 |
Robert Wittams |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |