| 1 |
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 04:32 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:20:18 -0800 |
| 3 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > No offense to anyone, but holding back hundreds of developers and |
| 5 |
> > thousands of users for a handful of developers |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> ...and how exactly are hundreds of developers and thousands of users |
| 8 |
> being held back? So far as I can see, in cases where anyone really is |
| 9 |
> being held back, the arch teams are quite happy to prioritise -- the |
| 10 |
> people who go around moaning about 'slacker archs' rarely if ever |
| 11 |
> actually have anything holding them back. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If anyone has any examples of where they really are being held back and |
| 14 |
> where they really have given the arch teams plenty of time to do |
| 15 |
> something, I'd like to see them... Somehow I doubt it happens very |
| 16 |
> often, if at all. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It happened several times during the 2007.1 release cycle. Of course, I |
| 19 |
don't feel like wasting my time searching bugs to justify myself to you, |
| 20 |
so if you're interested, feel free to search on your own. Pretending it |
| 21 |
doesn't happen doesn't make it go away. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 25 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 26 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 27 |
Games Developer/Foundation Trustee |
| 28 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives