Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:17:34
Message-Id: 20100307211922.248714b5@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday? by David Leverton
1 On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:09:28 +0000
2 David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
5 > > Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
6 > > candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
7 >
8 > This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's "flags" mechanism is for.
9 >
10 > http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/flags-overview.html
11
12
13 We've also talked about using flags for arch testing:
14 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213514
15
16
17 --
18 fonts, by design, by neglect
19 gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
20 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature