| 1 |
On 08/08/2011 12:33 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/06/2011 08:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> - gpg control packet Hi, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Because of this bug[1] I would like to introduce a new virtual for |
| 6 |
>> all the X*lock packages. This will contain the following packages |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> 1) alock 2) slock 3) xlockmore |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> This will be maintained by the desktop-misc herd ( and maybe X11 if |
| 11 |
>> you want to ) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> Unless there are any objections, I will create such a virtual and |
| 14 |
>> send it for review |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347729 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Please review the attached ebuild |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The virtual is useless without some wrapper script to execute any of the |
| 23 |
installed locks, since they have no other uniform command or syntax |
| 24 |
Perhaps even eselect module with the wrapper? |
| 25 |
But then why is this virtual, instead of just || ( ) list in the package |
| 26 |
that will install the wrapper? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Seems like an overkill in anycase |
Archives