From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Useflags: xsl vs xslt | ||
Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:23:22 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130428213316.763c3713@caribou.gateway.2wire.net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Useflags: xsl vs xslt by Peter Stuge |
1 | On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:05 +0200 |
2 | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
5 | > > The correct one should be xslt and that's it.. |
6 | > |
7 | > Can you please motivate your opinion? Saying "that's it" is quite hostile. |
8 | |
9 | Terse maybe. Blunt. Hostile? No. |
10 | |
11 | BTW, use xslt. |
12 | |
13 | :) |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gcc-porting |
17 | toolchain, wxwidgets |
18 | @ gentoo.org |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Useflags: xsl vs xslt | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |