1 |
On 24/07/21 17:16, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, everyone. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from |
5 |
> Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The 'old' set of Gentoo hashes including SHA512 went live in July 2012. |
8 |
> In November 2017, we have decided to remove the two other hashes and add |
9 |
> BLAKE2B in their stead. Today, all Gentoo packages are using BLAKE2B |
10 |
> and SHA512 hashes. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> To all extent, this is purely a cosmetic change. The benefit from |
13 |
> removing the additional hash is negligible, both from space perspective |
14 |
> and hashing speed perspective. The benefit from keeping two hashes is |
15 |
> also negligible. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Back during the 2017 discussion, Infra came to the conclusion that we're |
18 |
> going to keep SHA512 for a transition period, then remove it, and stay |
19 |
> with a single hash algorithm. In my opinion, we have kept it long |
20 |
> enough. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> WDYT? |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
I'd remove it once we have a second hash to add and/or BLAKE2B is |
26 |
widespread enough on upstream. |
27 |
|
28 |
lu |