| 1 |
Sven Köhler <skoehler <at> upb.de> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules and |
| 7 |
> 60-fuse.rules. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So that is _very_, _very_ unpractical, because the older your gentoo |
| 12 |
> gets, the more of such orphaned files you get. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Something similar (orphaned HAL policy preventing USB automounting) already has |
| 15 |
bitten some users recently, including me: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-518094.html |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
BTW, I really like the pace of changes in udev and hal. At least one can see |
| 20 |
that the projects are live and kicking :-) That said, it would be nice if |
| 21 |
portage/whatever took care of this so users wouldn't be forced to mess with the |
| 22 |
udev and/or hal policies... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives