Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:57:39
Message-Id: 20070324125451.GF13708@paradox.datanode.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:50:19AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Friday 23 March 2007, Josh Saddler wrote:
3 > > I'm very strongly against using Gentoo SoC time and resources for things
4 > > that are not officially part of Gentoo (yes, this statement could be
5 > > spun however you wish) or are not official Gentoo projects. And no, just
6 > > because a project has Gentoo developers in it doesn't mean that it's a
7 > > Gentoo project -- let's avoid the gray areas now, shall we? Just because
8 > > we have Gentoo devs who are also Gnome upstream doesn't make their
9 > > Gnome-related packages that happen to be in our tree official Gentoo
10 > > projects.
11 >
12 > i'd have to agree here
13 > -mike
14 Ditto. Gentoo SoC projects need to be for Gentoo developed and sponsored
15 code/projects, not third party projects, no matter how much they would whither
16 and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of gentoo+gnome integration
17 (i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be any more appropriate. Unless
18 there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the header, it isn't eligible in my opinion.
19
20 ~mcummings, the other mike
21
22
23 --
24
25 -----o()o----------------------------------------------
26 Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
27 Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
28 Gentoo/SPARC
29 Gentoo/AMD64
30 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
31 -----o()o----------------------------------------------
32
33 Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis "Piotr JaroszyƄski" <peper@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>