| 1 |
On 07/07/15 01:27, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:04:35 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I would love my commits to be reviewed, but I usually don't feel like |
| 5 |
>> reviewing anyone else's. That's... not uncommon. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well, you could at least get your commits reviewed by an automated build |
| 8 |
> system that starts from a clean stage each time. That's better than |
| 9 |
> nothing. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
I'll laugh about it next time I update OpenFOAM: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Fri Jun 27 12:52:19 2014 >>> sci-libs/openfoam-2.3.0 |
| 14 |
merge time: 1 hour, 5 minutes and 8 seconds. |
| 15 |
or |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sun Jun 29 20:36:09 2014 >>> sci-mathematics/nusmv-2.5.4 |
| 18 |
merge time: 2 hours, 58 minutes. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That's without dependencies, so from a clean minimal starting point |
| 22 |
(once you figure out what useflags are needed) you're looking at 12+ |
| 23 |
hours of walltime to get that checked. (On a reasonably modern Xeon with |
| 24 |
SSDs ...) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So thanks for your intentional comedy, but let's be serious here. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Have fun, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Patrick |
Archives