| 1 |
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 21:41:49 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 05:13:02 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Just a question: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Why do we even need to care about ChangeLog files? Can't we just use the |
| 8 |
> > git commit message to generate logs? E.g run a script on server side |
| 9 |
> > which will read the whole git shortlog and generate a changelog every |
| 10 |
> > $timeframe? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You seem to have missed the gist of the situation. I'm quoting it here |
| 13 |
> again to highlight it: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] |
| 16 |
> [snip] |
| 17 |
> * Proposed is to generate ChangeLogs from git commits on the rsync |
| 18 |
> server side when metadata generation is done |
| 19 |
> - Scripts to do this already exist[1] |
| 20 |
> [snip] |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> 1. http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog |
| 23 |
Ah you are right. It seems that I missed that e-mail on my inbox. Thanks for |
| 24 |
posting it again. |
| 25 |
It seems we are on the same page :) |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 29 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |
Archives