| 1 |
> > With your experience with the code you should know, would it be hard to |
| 2 |
> > implement the file/directory duality that comes natively with reiser4 |
| 3 |
> > into the VFS? This way reier4 would only by you performance... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I don't understand. The vfs doesn't care about these things. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Possibly a missunderstanding on my part. I do not know how it works at |
| 8 |
such a low level, I am not a kernel programmer. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I was thinking that some of the features that comes with reiser4 doesn't |
| 11 |
belong in the filesystem but at a higher level, on top of all |
| 12 |
filesystems. Thus I drew the conclusion vfs was the right place. |
| 13 |
1. The ability to open a directory as a file. |
| 14 |
2. The ability to execute a plugin as a filter when opening a |
| 15 |
file(/directory). |
| 16 |
A layer in between? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> This seems to be way off topic now. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
End of Thread. -John |
Archives