| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:06:55 -0700 |
| 8 |
> Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
>> This is enough. PMS is a work in progress its not going to cover |
| 10 |
>> everything that users and developers are going to be in some cases |
| 11 |
>> boneheaded enough to actually pull off (always have edge conditions). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> No no, you miss the point. If developers are doing something, either |
| 14 |
> PMS needs to allow it or they have to stop doing it. It's entirely |
| 15 |
> relevant to the topic at hand. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I agree. |
| 19 |
Also, this issue has arisen from a change in current policy. Even if |
| 20 |
Portage and repoman now allow the use of multiple suffixes, the |
| 21 |
devmanual still states that's illegal - so it's illegal in current policy. |
| 22 |
Instead of people arguing about a decision to uphold the current policy, |
| 23 |
I think they should be asking that we have a discussion about the |
| 24 |
current policy and propose alternatives, like is being done on the bug, |
| 25 |
and in the end submit it to the council for a voting. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
| 31 |
Gentoo-forums / Userrel / Proctors |
| 32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 34 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iD8DBQFGL5HTcAWygvVEyAIRAvNsAJ9FFkIWUbLjmsBHskfaxZbN0Fo7LgCgk5o9 |
| 37 |
UBuUR5erFfG3rFEktEhNiJ8= |
| 38 |
=r7Pd |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives