Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] REQUIRED_USE="test" vs. repoman | ||
| Date: | Sat, 08 Nov 2014 23:48:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFBiH9jBeCFC1Tu9QdqYd5HNF1QUhYJ=aDf5EGn7wetGpw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] REQUIRED_USE="test" vs. repoman by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On 9 November 2014 09:06, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Since EAPI 5, you need to either add test to IUSE, or else we need to |
| 4 | > add the test flag to IUSE_IMPLICIT in the base profile (that would |
| 5 | > require some discussion of pros/cons). |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | It should have been needed on EAPI4 too, but due to a side effect of |
| 9 | history and the way portage implemented it, it wasn't needed on EAPI0-4 on |
| 10 | *portage*, so repoman didn't warn about it. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442830 |
| 13 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525356 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | That lovely place where portage deviates from PMS =) |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Kent |
| 19 | |
| 20 | *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |