| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 12:57 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various |
| 5 |
> >> other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should |
| 6 |
> >> satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands |
| 7 |
> >> as well. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > While I do think this proposal is much better than the previous |
| 10 |
> > non-existing proposal, it still doesn't address the problem of having |
| 11 |
> > the sunrise overlay hosted on a non *.gentoo.org address to make it |
| 12 |
> > 100% clear to the public that it is unsupported. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Regards, |
| 15 |
> > Brix |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> So, move it to this.is.unsupported.and.will.blow.your.box.gentoo.org if |
| 18 |
> you feel it will help anybody. I feel it's completely irrelevant, but |
| 19 |
> that's just me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Your feelings aren't really the question here. The relevance of this |
| 22 |
request has been established by the users who have responded to this |
| 23 |
thread and have mentioned how they feel about things on *.gentoo.org |
| 24 |
infrastructure. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
In this instance, it isn't a matter of the developers opinions. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 30 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 31 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 32 |
Games - Developer |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives