Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:55:55
Message-Id: CAGfcS_kUVBr1PBTbjNd=j2PgZMX+tp73kBAYMqY5KMkL3F7k1w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:45 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
2 <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:39:00 -0500
4 > Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >>
6 >> > You aren't taking the time to read your own emerge output.
7 >
8 > It always says that same generic message. If that is the case, then why
9 > even have that option?
10
11 The --unmerge option is there to let people shoot themselves in the
12 feet if they know what they're doing. Anybody who uses it routinely
13 is going to get burned by it sooner or later. It simply is not
14 intended for day-to-day-use. I'd be all for renaming it to something
15 like --unsafe-unmerge and getting rid of the short abbreviation.
16
17 --depclean is the option people should be using day-to-day.
18
19 There are cases with blocks that portage doesn't handle correctly
20 where --unmerge is sometimes the simplest way around them. Fortunate
21 this is rare these days.
22
23 --
24 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>