1 |
Samuli Suominen posted on Tue, 17 May 2011 03:48:23 +0300 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> First of all, it's disappointing how little the packages in the |
4 |
> linux-headers-2.6.38 tracker[1] intrest people. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/359595 |
7 |
|
8 |
Indeed. I finally decided to try to get the netbook's webcam running the |
9 |
other day. With kernel 2.6.38's lack of v4l1, it's a serious webcam |
10 |
package wasteland out there! (luvcview, hasciicam... that was about it.) |
11 |
=:^( |
12 |
|
13 |
luvcview demonstrated that it was working, tho, and it was quite apparent |
14 |
I had to wait for the 2.6.38 stabilization to take care of the others |
15 |
before I tried them. But /how/ long has this removal been in progress and |
16 |
the apps are /still/ dependent on videodev.h? Disappointing, to say the |
17 |
least. Guess dealing with it's unavoidable, now. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Planning on masking some of the low hanging fruits from the tracker. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> And after the bugs are mostly (or all) dealt with, I suggest we remove |
22 |
> USE="v4l2" and make USE="v4l" mean: |
23 |
> |
24 |
> "Enable support for video4linux (with or without userspace library |
25 |
> libv4l)" |
26 |
> |
27 |
> And rename the pkgs using USE="v4l2" to USE="v4l". Since there will be |
28 |
> only video4linux version 2, using libv4l or without (or possibly using |
29 |
> libv4l compability layer for libv4l1). But no more straight up version |
30 |
> 1 support since videodev.h is gone since Linux 2.6.38 |
31 |
|
32 |
++ |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
36 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
37 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |