1 |
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:22:00AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht |
4 |
> <nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net> wrote: |
5 |
> > Give a git access to the developpers beside the current CVS ? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> or replace cvs with git... oh and you can replace rsync too... because |
8 |
> git is faster there as well. |
9 |
|
10 |
Provide a git only access today is not serious. Some developpers may |
11 |
not want to learn/switch to git. It could be a long term goal, however. |
12 |
|
13 |
I'm not thinking of internal tools efficiency. It's all about workflow. |
14 |
|
15 |
Also, rsync just do what it has to do the right way. Git does not fit to |
16 |
that kind of job. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Nicolas Sebrecht |