Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:04
Message-Id: 546C15F6.5090605@alectenharmsel.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree by Brian Evans
1 On 11/18/2014 09:38 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > On 11/18/2014 09:17 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
6 >> Hey devs,
7 >>
8 >> This is my first mail to this list. If this is out of line, let me
9 >> know.
10 >>
11 >> I've been playing around with Jenkins (continuous integration
12 >> server) recently for a couple of personal projects, including my
13 >> own overlay. I thought it would be cool to run 'repoman full' on
14 >> the portage tree. A couple of things surprised me:
15 >>
16 >> * It took over 4 hours * So many (~3MB output) warnings, especially
17 >> "upstream parallel compilation bug"... thought autoconf handled
18 >> this, but I guess not * 9233 ebuilds that use a deprecated EAPI
19 >>
20 >> Please don't take this the wrong way; I'm not accusing anyone, and
21 >> I still love Gentoo, it was just kind of funny. I've attached the
22 >> full log for anyone that's interested.
23 >>
24 >> Alec
25 >>
26 > This is nothing new
27 >
28 > http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-checks/ has continuous
29 > output.
30 >
31 > Brian
32 >
33
34 Cool, I didn't know about that.
35
36 Alec