| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 04/02/2013 04:01 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Here we go again. Fine, keep arguing about the really important |
| 5 |
> > question "why old X is in the tree when new X is stable". |
| 6 |
> > Did anyone actually consider to ask the maintainers instead of opening |
| 7 |
> > a public debate on this? I guess no, because |
| 8 |
> > bikeshedding in the mailing list is so much better. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I am sorry about that. In fact I was about to file a bug, but then |
| 12 |
> decided to take it up here and CC base-system. That was probably a mistake. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Thanks to everyone for the comments... or not. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> People who are not interested in this topic should ignore the thread, it's |
| 17 |
not necessary to reply with the word "bikeshedding" every time you see a |
| 18 |
thread that you consider mundane or trivial. I was looking forward to |
| 19 |
hearing some insights on why bash-3.1 is still around, when I get sick of |
| 20 |
hearing about it, I'll stop following the thread. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-Ben |
Archives