Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:48:21
Message-Id: CAN3Atvq17z2nrXPdn+UaRarm=EF1WH8pShO3BOzopOoGn+1tvg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Arun Raghavan
1 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote:
2 > I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git
3 > Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems
4 > and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's
5 > good enough for you.
6
7 The difference is that while Git is much faster, comes with a very low
8 WTF/secs rate and really forces you to do things the right way, other
9 L*********e software is not and I agree with you on this.
10
11 my 0.02c ;-)
12
13 > --
14 > Arun Raghavan
15 > http://arunraghavan.net/
16 > (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)
17 >
18
19
20
21 --
22 Fabio Erculiani