From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ? | ||
Date: | Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:19:29 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120829151827.GA15755@linux1 | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ? by Tobias Klausmann |
1 | On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:57:48PM +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
2 | > As a first crude datapoint, I compared the build times |
3 | > (configure+make) of udev-171-r6 and -188 on our dev Alpha. This |
4 | > is a machine that's on the speedier side of off-mainstream |
5 | > architecures, but as a datapoint, it should be enough. |
6 | |
7 | No, not exactly, because udev-188 doesn't build systemd. We use |
8 | specific targets in the Makefile to avoid doing that. |
9 | |
10 | William |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ? | Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o> |