| 1 |
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:27:12 +0200 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 06/16/2013 07:21 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 5 |
> > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: |
| 6 |
> > [...] |
| 7 |
> >> Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the |
| 8 |
> >> intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do |
| 9 |
> >> not like how long portage is taking now for dep calculations. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > And, cannot that efforts be put in enhancing portage instead? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> How many forks do we got now? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
How much longer are we going to hold on to something that suffers from |
| 17 |
feature creep and is based on a design invented years ago that doesn't |
| 18 |
take into account the new features (eg. subslots) that are added today? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
See my reply to Pacho for more insight why we can't enhance Portage. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
With kind regards, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 26 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 29 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 30 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives