1 |
On 02/10/2013 03:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:06:39 -0500 |
3 |
> James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>>>>>> "AKH" == Andreas K Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> writes: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> AKH> To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the "big red |
8 |
>> AKH> warning" exactly tells you what to do (and even which profile to |
9 |
>> AKH> pick, which would be more complicated in a news item). |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> But it doesn't tell one why the change was made, what differences to |
12 |
>> expect once it is done. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> What does: |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> diff -uNr profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0/eapi profiles/default/linux/amd64/13.0/eapi |
17 |
>> --- profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0/eapi 2009-08-17 14:54:00.000000000 -0400 |
18 |
>> +++ profiles/default/linux/amd64/13.0/eapi 2013-01-20 06:31:02.000000000 -0500 |
19 |
>> @@ -1 +1 @@ |
20 |
>> -2 |
21 |
>> +5 |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> actually *do* to one's system? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Out of curiosity, does portage suggest switching to the new profiles |
26 |
> even if it doesn't support its EAPI? |
27 |
|
28 |
Yes, although it's possible to include additional instructions in the |
29 |
deprecated file, as you can see in the code here: |
30 |
|
31 |
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=blob_plain;f=pym/portage/package/ebuild/deprecated_profile_check.py;h=2acf8e3c2e189eb76cfda2ad4743ce238fc81230;hb=HEAD |
32 |
|
33 |
It interprets all lines after the first one as upgrade instructions. |
34 |
-- |
35 |
Thanks, |
36 |
Zac |