| 1 |
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hiya all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting |
| 5 |
> given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for |
| 6 |
> Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this |
| 7 |
> proposal can be found at http://dev.gentoo.org/~christel/coc.xml |
| 8 |
> comments and suggestions both on- and off-list are appreciated. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Any input will have to be received by Thursday, 15 March, 1200GMT in |
| 11 |
> order to be useful; the Council will be voting on it later that day at |
| 12 |
> 2100UTC. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The document makes no mention of who 'The Proctors' are. My first |
| 16 |
reading says this is partly by design; but I would like to clarify that |
| 17 |
part (ie; the appointment of proctors is outside the scope of this |
| 18 |
document). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The document makes no mention of what 'Gentoo Official Communication |
| 21 |
Infrastructure' is. Does it include the forums? Does it include all of |
| 22 |
IRC, some of IRC, etc. I don't wish for you to enumerate it in the |
| 23 |
document; that would be a PITA for you to maintain. My primary concern |
| 24 |
(as a former #gentoo op and a guy who reads the forum occasionally) is |
| 25 |
that if you are attempting to enforce this on the forums and on bits of |
| 26 |
IRC that they know you plan on doing so so they can mend their policies |
| 27 |
accordingly. IE I don't want to hear about how person Foo got banned on |
| 28 |
the forums for this magical new policy when the forums policy is still |
| 29 |
old, etc... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
The document refers to warnings but doesn't describe who they are |
| 32 |
supposed to be from. Are these warnings from the Proctor, from a dev, |
| 33 |
from a user? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I guess in relation to my other point about; does this affect only main |
| 36 |
ML's or all Gentoo ML's? I have seen points of abuse on other mailing |
| 37 |
lists but I figured that most..what I'll term "project-ML's" are |
| 38 |
relatively self-policing (similarly to their #gentoo-<project> irc |
| 39 |
counterparts). I am wondering if this document is meant to smooth |
| 40 |
things over on the other ML's as well. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
I think that sums up all the real policy concerns I have; thanks for |
| 43 |
reading. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-Alec |
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives