1 |
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 11:55:10AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> If I change the instructions as you suggest to re-package upstream's |
3 |
> tarball the name wouldn't need the -vendor suffix since the tarball would be a |
4 |
> fork, but I'm not asking people to fork and repackage upstream's tarballs, just |
5 |
> the vendor folder. Fortunately, there is no reason to fork since it is very |
6 |
> easy to package the vendor folder with Go's tools. |
7 |
|
8 |
Doing: |
9 |
tar ... project-1.0-vendor.tar.xz project-1.0/vendor |
10 |
|
11 |
would only package the "vendor" directory and not the whole |
12 |
project directory. Then when auto-unpacked by src_unpack, the |
13 |
vendor directory is added under project-1.0/ |
14 |
|
15 |
So this isn't repacking upstream's or a fork. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
ionen |