Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ?
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:44:37
Message-Id: 46059ce105031618441089e1e0@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? by "Andrew D. Fant"
1 or geometry or geopolography or geomancy or... :)
2
3
4 On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:20:12 -0500, Andrew D. Fant <jfmuggs@g.o> wrote:
5 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6 > Hash: SHA1
7 >
8 > Mike Frysinger wrote:
9 > | is it just me or does it seem redundant to have 'sciences' at the end
10 > of a
11 > | sci-* category ? wouldnt it make more sense as just 'sci-geo' ?
12 >
13 > Would sci-geo be geography or geology or geosciences?
14 >
15 > Andy
16 >
17 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
19 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
20 >
21 > iD8DBQFCOOlbOq80mJ2AvM0RAutfAJ4t1A1mViGYXvjeBB1WmGB+lAUjigCfSEEh
22 > 9xNfRgBhhBNhZz9FlA4Ysvc=
23 > =yVXK
24 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 > --
26 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
27 >
28 >
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] category sci-geosciences redundant ? Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>